Ognjen Ugrešić

Full Name: Ognjen Ugrešić

Date of Birth: April 10, 2006

Nationality: Serbian 🇷🇸

Current Club: FK Partizan Belgrade

League: Super liga Srbije

Contract Expiry: June 30, 2030

Current MV: €6.50 m

Preferred Foot: Right

Height / Weight: 1.88M

← Heatmap

Best Suited To →

Role: Box-Crashing Midfielder

Behaviors

On-Ball Behavior:

  • Carries with intent through central zones. Not a decorative carrier, likes to drives forward to commit midfielders and force defensive reactions. Uses momentum rather than finesse.

  • Vertical-minded distributor. Always looking to break lines or find runners early; sees ambitious passes consistently, even if execution can lag behind vision.

  • Arrives to finish, not to circulate. When he gets on the ball near the box, his mindset is goal-oriented — shoot, slip, or crash, rarely passive.

  • Comfortable receiving under pressure. Uses body well to shield, turn, and play forward, though first touch can occasionally escape him at speed.

Off-Ball Behavior:

  • Elite second-line runner. Times late box arrivals from deep, attacking central channels and arriving unmarked — a major source of his goal threat.

  • Presses aggressively in midfield. Steps forward to engage ball-carriers, closes space quickly, and uses size and reach to disrupt buildup.

  • Covers large defensive zones. Tracks runners diligently, shuttles laterally to plug gaps, and recovers quickly when shape breaks.

  • Maintains central balance. Reads when to hold versus when to step out, especially in Partizan’s fluid formation rotations

  • Wins duels through timing and power. Not elegant, but effective — uses body, reach, and anticipation to win second balls and regain possession.

  • Defensive reliability off the ball. Does not switch off after advancing; immediately recovers positioning on defensive transition.

Player DNA — Ognjen Ugrešić

Profile Type: Box-to-Box Midfielder

Pure Traits 🟢 Will Travel

  • Second-line box crashing. Instinctive late arrivals from midfield generate consistent high-value chances despite a deeper nominal role.
  • Work rate & defensive coverage. Covers significant vertical and lateral ground, presses aggressively, and recovers quickly. Off-ball contribution is reliable across intensity levels.
  • Vision & passing imagination. Identifies advanced solutions early, spotting runners between lines and into channels even when execution lags intent.

System Traits 🔴 Environment Dependent

  • Advanced freedom from a double pivot. Attacking impact spikes alongside a true anchor; without security behind him, forward surges can destabilize midfield structure.
  • High-block, front-foot requirement. Most effective when the team holds territory and compresses space. Influence drops in low-block or passive setups.

Context-Enhanced Traits 🟡 Situation Dependent

  • Pressing triggers in structured chaos. Thrives in fluid, rotational systems; looks less decisive in static shapes.
  • Ball carrying through central channels. Most dangerous when driving forward with momentum rather than operating in slow, tight buildup.

Exposed Traits ⚫ Will Be Targeted

  • Decision speed in control phases. Can rush actions when asked to slow the game; opponents may bait forced vertical passes.
  • Technical cleanliness at pace. Touch and execution can lag behind intent, particularly under lateral pressure.
  • Fluidity vs compact midfields. Appears clumsier when space is denied and movements must be subtle rather than explosive.

Athletic Profile

  • Acceleration: Quick for size — consistently beats midfielders into the box from deep.
  • Endurance: Engine — maintains pressing and late box entries deep into matches.
  • Strength: Powerful — reliable duel winner, difficult to dislodge centrally.
  • Agility: Average — functional movement over elegance.

Cognitive Profile

  • Decision speed: Quick but raw — sees options early, execution still catching up.
  • Risk profile: Aggressive–calculated — looks to hurt teams vertically.
  • Spatial awareness: High — excellent timing when vacating midfield to arrive late.
  • Adaptability: Positive — learning curve evident season to season.

Psychological Markers

  • Big game performance: Rises — consistently impactful in European matches.
  • Mistake reaction: Resilient — does not hide, demands the ball again.
  • Consistency: Improving — influence growing as composure develops.
  • Competitive mentality: Fighter — embraces physical responsibility.

Development Priorities

  • Composure in possession. Learning when not to accelerate play unlocks higher levels.
  • Technical refinement. Cleaner first touch and passing under pressure.
  • Role discipline without an anchor. Reducing reliance on a dominant DM increases portability.

Travel Readiness Score: 8 / 10

  • Strong base of transferable traits with manageable system dependencies. Adaptation across multiple environments is likely, provided the setup does not exaggerate control-phase weaknesses.

Transferability & Scalability

Glossary of Traits

Cognitive Traits: Press Resistance, Decision-Making Speed, Spatial Awareness

Technical Execution: Ball Security, Passing Variety & Execution, First Touch

Tactical Intelligence: Defensive Positioning, Transitional Awareness

Physical & Psychological: Duelling & Physical Presence, Mentality & Composure

League Transferability Graph. Predicted best landing-spots right now

League Scores (1–10)

  • Premier League → 6/10

    • Athleticism and work rate translate, but tempo and decision punishment expose current technical rawness. Viable with the right role and partner behind him..

    La Liga → 5/10

    • Intelligence and movement fit, but slower rhythm and technical demands highlight composure and first-touch limitations.

    Bundesliga → 8/10

    • Verticality, transition volume, and emphasis on athletic interiors suit his engine, box-crashing, and pressing instincts. Technical refinement can be developed without suppressing impact.

    Serie A → 7/10

    • Tactical structure and emphasis on timing favor his spatial intelligence and second-line runs. Needs composure growth, but profile fits well alongside a true holding midfielder.

    Ligue 1 → 6/10

    • Physical tools and transition play work, but execution consistency becomes a swing factor. Impact likely fluctuates early.

    Eredivisie → 7/10

    • Space and tempo allow his box entries and vertical game to shine while smoothing technical edges. Strong developmental environment.

Generic Trait Scale Glossary (1–10)

1 – Deficient: Consistently below professional standard. Major liability when tested in this area.

3 – Weak: Shows glimpses but unreliable. Can function in low-pressure moments but often exposed.

5 – Functional: Meets baseline professional competency. Adequate in most situations but not a strength.

7 – Strong: Above average for the level. Reliable, impactful, and holds up across different contexts.

10 – Elite: Defines games at the highest level. Exceptional, rare, and scalable to top competitions.

Projection & Risk Assessment

🔧 1. Development Risk

How likely is this player to not reach their expected technical, physical, or tactical potential?

Score Meaning Indicators
1 (Minimal Risk) Already playing at high level for age; consistent starter; no major injury history; strong learning curve >2000 senior mins/year, stable club, shows tactical discipline
2 (Low) Consistent developmental pathway, maybe small injury concern or plateauing at times U21 mins + upward trajectory, mentally mature
3 (Medium) Decent base but red flags exist (inconsistency, stalling, low-level environment, minutes managed) Bench role or reserves, decent but stagnant tools
4 (High) Poor development history, low minutes, injuries, miscast in current role, maturity questions Bounces clubs, repeated injuries, no U21/first team pathway
5 (Extreme) Almost no evidence of upward curve, physical regression or consistent injuries; major red flag Hasn’t played >500 mins in a season, out of favor at multiple clubs

💰 3. Market Risk

How risky is this player from a valuation perspective (age, hype, exposure, volatility, transfer context)?

Score Meaning Indicators
1 (Minimal Risk) Under-the-radar gem, low price, high upside Cheap buy from under-scouted market (e.g., Balkans, Nordics)
2 (Low) Reasonable valuation for age/potential, not overhyped Good fit financially, no major bidding war
3 (Medium) Slightly inflated due to club, media, or agent Plays at high-visibility club, small overpay risk
4 (High) Overpriced or being shopped aggressively Club actively pushing sale, no market bidding pressure
5 (Extreme) Big fee required and no guarantee of resale Already failed at bigger club, high wage profile, agent-driven

🧠 2. Psychological Risk

How much uncertainty exists around mentality, focus, motivation, and adaptability?

Score Meaning Indicators
1 (Minimal Risk) Mature beyond years, proven adaptability, team-first attitude No off-field drama, thrives under pressure, self-regulating
2 (Low) Good profile, small worries about competitiveness or emotionality May need mentorship but highly coachable
3 (Medium) Sometimes drifts, hot-and-cold, needs structure Prone to coasting in weaker environments
4 (High) Struggles with adversity, questionable attitude, arrogance or insecurity Off-field incidents, doesn’t respond to tactical feedback
5 (Extreme) Actively sabotages growth. Ego-driven, mentally erratic, disciplinary issues Known locker room problem, multiple coach/club clashes

🧩 4. Systemic Risk

How heavily does this player rely on a specific system or role to succeed?

Score Meaning Indicators
1 (Minimal Risk) Plays reliably across systems and role types Press-resistant, strong spatial awareness, tactically flexible
2 (Low) Better in some setups but still contributes in multiple roles Slight drop in output outside ideal role
3 (Medium) Clearly has a “best system” and drops off elsewhere Needs possession-based system or double pivot partner
4 (High) Struggles when not in exact tactical blueprint Lost without pressing cues, or weak in non-transition games
5 (Extreme) Unusable outside of a niche structure Cannot press, cannot hold, cannot rotate positions

Summary

Verdict Statement:

A physically dominant, high-energy box-crashing midfielder whose off-ball intelligence, late box arrivals, and two-way output give him real senior value already, with upside tied to composure and technical refinement rather than role clarity.

Good/Bad Split

Good:

  • Elite engine and physical presence for the position; consistently impacts both boxes with timing, reach, and duel strength

  • Excellent off-ball movement and spatial instincts, particularly arriving from the second line and pressing high

  • Progressive mentality: carries, runs, and passes forward with intent rather than recycling safely

Bad:

  • Decision-making can be rushed in attacking moments; plays faster than the situation demands

  • Technical execution doesn’t always match vision, especially on ambitious passes

  • Movement can look slightly clumsy due to size, limiting fluidity in tight combinations

B.A.S.E. Potential Rating -

7/10: ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️

Projection: Regular starter at top-division level with clear two-way value. Raises team floor through energy, structure, and secondary goal threat rather than serving as a tempo-controlling centerpiece. Strong fit for competitive European sides that value midfield balance and physical presence.