Pedri
Full Name:
Date of Birth:
Nationality:
Current Club:
League:
Contract Expiry:
Current MV:
Preferred Foot:
Height / Weight:
Similar type of player:
↑
← Heatmap
Primary Position →
Role: Roaming Playmaker
Behaviors
On-Ball Behavior:
Off-Ball Behavior:
Technical & Tactical Profile
Tempo Control / Adaptability NT
- Adjusts game speed cleanly, reads momentum shifts early.
- Regular scanning underpins calm rhythm control.
Decision Speed NT
- Quick reactions in tight areas, retains clarity with pressure.
- Pre-receive choices developing; can telegraph passes at times DT.
Ball Retention under Pressure NT
- Secure first touch and half-turns create exits in traffic.
- Recovery after contact is coachable ST.
Passing Range & Variety CT
- Reliable short and mid range. Longer switches appear when system provides width and time.
- Risk appetite leans safe; variety increases with tactical security.
Summary
- Strengths: Tempo control, tight-area composure, consistent scanning.
- Risks: Physical resilience after contact, conservative risk profile.
- Verdict: Stable technical base with upside in range and aggression given the right environment.
Trait Key
NT Natural Trait — Core to player’s identity, unlikely to change.
DT Developing Trait — Room to grow, but observable tendency exists.
ST Suppressible Trait — Can be reduced or neutralized with coaching.
CT Contextual Trait — Emerges or disappears depending on system.
Profile Stability Tiers
Ultra-Stable: Traits are largely natural or steadily developing. Highly transferable across leagues and systems.
Stable: Most traits intrinsic or developing, with some manageable system dependency.
Context-Sensitive: Requires specific tactical conditions to shine. Medium risk profile.
System-Dependent: Relies heavily on structure or coach’s scheme. Risky outside setup.
System-Creation: Output fabricated by system/role. Very high transfer risk.
Appendix of Graphs:
Transferability & Scalability
Glossary of Traits
Cognitive Traits: Positioning, anticipation, decision-making
Technical Execution: Tackling, aerials, press composure, distribution
Tactical Intelligence: Defensive spacing, rotations, cover awareness
Physical & Psychological: Recovery speed, mobility, mentality
Generic Trait Scale Glossary (1–10)
1 – Deficient: Consistently below professional standard. Major liability when tested in this area.
3 – Weak: Shows glimpses but unreliable. Can function in low-pressure moments but often exposed.
5 – Functional: Meets baseline professional competency. Adequate in most situations but not a strength.
7 – Strong: Above average for the level. Reliable, impactful, and holds up across different contexts.
10 – Elite: Defines games at the highest level. Exceptional, rare, and scalable to top competitions.
Psychological and Intangibles
Resilience -
Focus & Presence -
Risk Management -
Durability (Mental &Physical) -
Cultural Adaptability -
Coachability -
Projection & Risk Assessment
🔧 1. Development Risk
How likely is this player to not reach their expected technical, physical, or tactical potential?
| Score | Meaning | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Minimal Risk) | Already playing at high level for age; consistent starter; no major injury history; strong learning curve | >2000 senior mins/year, stable club, shows tactical discipline |
| 2 (Low) | Consistent developmental pathway, maybe small injury concern or plateauing at times | U21 mins + upward trajectory, mentally mature |
| 3 (Medium) | Decent base but red flags exist (inconsistency, stalling, low-level environment, minutes managed) | Bench role or reserves, decent but stagnant tools |
| 4 (High) | Poor development history, low minutes, injuries, miscast in current role, maturity questions | Bounces clubs, repeated injuries, no U21/first team pathway |
| 5 (Extreme) | Almost no evidence of upward curve, physical regression or consistent injuries; major red flag | Hasn’t played >500 mins in a season, out of favor at multiple clubs |
💰 3. Market Risk
How risky is this player from a valuation perspective (age, hype, exposure, volatility, transfer context)?
| Score | Meaning | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Minimal Risk) | Under-the-radar gem, low price, high upside | Cheap buy from under-scouted market (e.g., Balkans, Nordics) |
| 2 (Low) | Reasonable valuation for age/potential, not overhyped | Good fit financially, no major bidding war |
| 3 (Medium) | Slightly inflated due to club, media, or agent | Plays at high-visibility club, small overpay risk |
| 4 (High) | Overpriced or being shopped aggressively | Club actively pushing sale, no market bidding pressure |
| 5 (Extreme) | Big fee required and no guarantee of resale | Already failed at bigger club, high wage profile, agent-driven |
To change a higlighted row, enter in:
<tr style="background-color:#fff176; font-weight:bold;">
🧠 2. Psychological Risk
How much uncertainty exists around mentality, focus, motivation, and adaptability?
| Score | Meaning | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Minimal Risk) | Mature beyond years, proven adaptability, team-first attitude | No off-field drama, thrives under pressure, self-regulating |
| 2 (Low) | Good profile, small worries about competitiveness or emotionality | May need mentorship but highly coachable |
| 3 (Medium) | Sometimes drifts, hot-and-cold, needs structure | Prone to coasting in weaker environments |
| 4 (High) | Struggles with adversity, questionable attitude, arrogance or insecurity | Off-field incidents, doesn’t respond to tactical feedback |
| 5 (Extreme) | Actively sabotages growth. Ego-driven, mentally erratic, disciplinary issues | Known locker room problem, multiple coach/club clashes |
🧩 4. Systemic Risk
How heavily does this player rely on a specific system or role to succeed?
| Score | Meaning | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Minimal Risk) | Plays reliably across systems and role types | Press-resistant, strong spatial awareness, tactically flexible |
| 2 (Low) | Better in some setups but still contributes in multiple roles | Slight drop in output outside ideal role |
| 3 (Medium) | Clearly has a “best system” and drops off elsewhere | Needs possession-based system or double pivot partner |
| 4 (High) | Struggles when not in exact tactical blueprint | Lost without pressing cues, or weak in non-transition games |
| 5 (Extreme) | Unusable outside of a niche structure | Cannot press, cannot hold, cannot rotate positions |
Summary
Verdict Statement: One or two sentences that give the essence of the player
Good/Bad Split: Bullet form mini-diagnosis
Good:
Bad:
B.A.S.E. Potential Rating: ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️ ⚽️
5 – Baseline Pro
Projection: Can sustain a professional career, but ceiling is limited to depth roles or weaker leagues.
6 – Solid Role Player
Projection: Capable of filling squad roles at competitive clubs, occasional starter in mid-level leagues, but not a long-term core piece.
7 – Reliable Starter
Projection: Regular starter at top-division level. Consistent, trustworthy, but not someone who raises the ceiling of an elite side.
8 – High-Level Starter
Projection: Starter at top-5 league or strong European club. Contributes at Champions League level, though not the central figure.
9 – Elite
Projection: Among the best in position across top leagues. Shapes team identity, consistently delivers against elite opposition, and shifts outcomes at the highest level.
10 – World-Class
Projection: One of the defining players in world football today. Consistently decisive, dictates games against any opposition, and serves as the reference point for the position.
To change a higlighted row, enter in:
<tr style="background-color:#fff176; font-weight:bold;">